Frankfurt am Main, 20 - 21 June 2023 - at the same time as Eurobike

Evaluation

External evaluation

Please fill out all fields and click on "Submit now ...". Fields with an asterisk * are obligatory.

1. General information
E-Mail *
1.1 Which institution did you represent at the National Cycling Congress? Politics – federal level Politics – federal state level Politics – district level Politics – city/municipality level Administration – federal level Administration – federal state level Administration – district level Administration – city/municipality level Industry Associations Academia Press/media Other:
1.2 What is your position? Executive level (e.g. district commissioner, mayor, managing director) Management level (e.g. head of department, head of branch, middle management) Working level (e.g. advisor, executive officer) Other:
1.3 Please indicate your postal code
1.4 Was the 8th National Cycling Congress the first National Cycling Congress you attended? yes no
1.5 Did you attend the Congress on both days? yes Only on the 1st day of the Congress – 20 June 2023 Only on the 2nd day of the Congress – 21 June 2023
1.6 How did you learn about the Congress? Invitation by email Homepage of the National Cycling Congress Other website Recommendation from work Media (press release and other) Other:
1.7 Why did you attend the National Cycling Congress? (multiple answers possible) Why did you attend the National Cycling Congress? (multiple answers possible) I wanted to be informed about current topics. I wanted to exchange ideas and experience with others. I wanted to find business/cooperation partners. I wanted to develop my expertise. I wanted to be inspired by good practice. I wanted to take away added value for my daily work. Other:
2. Elements of the Congress and individual topics
2.1 The Congress programme was well put together for me and my work. I completely agree I somewhat agree I somewhat disagree I completely disagree
2.2 In selecting the topics, the right priorities were set for me and my work. I completely agree I somewhat agree I somewhat disagree I completely disagree
2.3 On the 1st Congress day, which event type was your personal highlight?
2.4 Why did you like this event type best? (max. 500 characters).
2.5 On the 2nd Congress day, which event type was your personal highlight?
2.6 Why did you like this event type best? (max. 500 characters).
2.7 (2.8/2.9) Did you participate in an excursion? yes no 2.8 Which excursion did you choose? 2.9 How satisfied were you with the excursion? Very satisfied Rather satisfied Rather not satisfied Not at all satisfied
2.10 (2.11) Did you visit the exhibition? yes no 2.11 How did you like the exhibition? Was it ...? Very good Good Not that good Not good
3. Networking and interaction
3.1 (3.2) Did you participate in a side event? yes no 3.2 How did you like the side events with the possibility for networking? Were they ...? Very good Good Not that good Not good

3.3 The possibilities for discussion in the A1 to D4 expert forums were... Very good Good Not that good Not good
3.4 The use, functioning and usability of the Slido questionnaire tool during the expert forums were ... Very good Good Not that good Not good
3.5 The possibilities for networking with other participants during the entire Congress were ... Very good Good Not that good Not good
4. What did you take away?
4.1 What key contents can you take home for you and/or your work? (max. 500 characters).
4.2 On which topics would you like more in-depth coverage, for example events organized by the Federal Mobility Forum, the working groups on walking and cycling or other actors? (max. 500 characters).
4.3 Any other suggestions, criticism or praise you would like to share with us? (max. 500 characters).
5. Organization
5.1 The atmosphere and the way the Congress was structured were ... Very good Good Not that good Not good Further statements: (max. 500 characters).
5.2 Registration and support during the Congress were ... Very good Good Not that good Not good Further statements: (max. 500 characters).
5.3 The catering during the Congress was ... Very good Good Not that good Not good Further statements: (max. 500 characters).